by Traverse Legal, reviewed by Brian Hall - September 16, 2025 - Business Law, Contracts, Entity Formation, Venture Capital
Intellectual Property (IP) dominates the startup balance sheet. It also fractures under pressure. For founders building defensible technology and investors underwriting long-term value, legal clarity around ownership is non-negotiable.
Undocumented IP or unresolved assignments won’t always surface in early discussions, but they show up quickly in diligence. And when they do, deals stall, valuations drop, or trust breaks. Companies that invest early in IP structure minimize risk, accelerate closings, and build stronger investor alignment.
Every venture investor evaluates IP posture as part of core diligence, especially when the company’s value is tied to software, brand, product design, or data. A clear record of ownership from founder contributions to employee work-for-hire agreements is the baseline expectation.
An unassigned IP is a red flag. If early product code, brand assets, or domain names were created by contractors or advisors without a formal assignment, the company doesn’t own its foundation. That means the investor doesn’t either.
Third-party claims, even indirect ones, create friction. Open-source dependencies, vague licenses, or prior consulting work reused in a startup context can all trigger questions around exclusivity and defensibility. Investors cut terms or delay closings when founders fail to deliver clear answers.
Legal counsel should confirm that all IP developed pre- or post-incorporation is fully assigned, without carve-outs or ambiguity. Traverse Legal’s technology and IP team frequently audits IP readiness ahead of investor meetings or acquisition prep to ensure ownership aligns with what the company presents on paper.
Diligence doesn’t start with deep technical reviews but with simple legal verification. Investors want signed IP assignments from founders, employees, and contractors. If anyone contributed to code, branding, strategy documents, or creative assets, they should have signed agreements transferring ownership to the company.
Trademarks and domains should be registered in the entity’s name, not in a founder’s account or a third-party registrar with incomplete records. Disorganized IP portfolios signal operational immaturity and raise concerns about future enforceability.
Licensing is another review point. Software companies relying on open-source components must confirm compliance with license terms. If proprietary features depend on code governed by restrictive licenses (e.g., GPL or AGPL), the company may face commercial limitations or exposure.
Encumbrances: pledges, liens, or collateral agreements must also be disclosed. Lenders embed these terms in debt financings or bridge notes that pledge IP as collateral. Without clean resolution, these agreements complicate later funding or acquisition events.
Every investor’s due diligence checklist includes a review of IP documentation. Startups that handle cleanup before diligence starts maintain control of the timeline and the narrative.
Any missing IP assignments should be collected and signed immediately, especially for early contractors, freelancers, or informal collaborators. Founders who contributed core IP before the company was formed must also retroactively assign those rights to the company.
A quick IP audit can clarify ownership, licensing posture, and filing status. The review process surfaces unregistered trademarks, lapsed domains, and missing IP assignments, and clean fixes if handled early.
Documentation should be added to the data room in a clear, organized format: assignment agreements, registration certificates, license terms, and invention assignment agreements, all aligned to the cap table and employment history.
Investors don’t expect perfection, but they do expect ownership certainty. When IP is ambiguous, the value of the company’s technology, brand, and go-to-market assets collapses under scrutiny.
A defensible IP portfolio does more than reduce legal risk. It builds investor confidence, accelerates closings, and protects valuation at both entry and exit.
Startups preparing for funding or M&A can work with Traverse Legal’s IP and tech counsel to clean up documentation and lock in ownership before term sheets go out.
📚 Get AI-powered insights from this content:
Brian A. Hall is the Managing Partner of Traverse Legal and a trusted deal attorney to founders, investors, and high-growth companies. He guides clients through mergers, acquisitions, IP monetization, and mission-critical commercial disputes across the tech, consumer products, and services sectors. Drawing on in-house GC experience and his fixed-fee TraverseGC® model, Brian delivers practical, business-first legal strategies that protect assets and accelerate growth.
As a founding partner of Traverse Legal, PLC, he has more than thirty years of experience as an attorney for both established companies and emerging start-ups. His extensive experience includes navigating technology law matters and complex litigation throughout the United States.
We’re here to field your questions and concerns. If you are a company able to pay a reasonable legal fee each month, please contact us today.
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by attorney Enrico Schaefer, who has more than 20 years of legal experience as a practicing Business, IP, and Technology Law litigation attorney.
