Can Derivative Works Be Copyrighted?

Can Derivative Works Be Copyrighted?

Image yourself an artist (of any sort) who has drawn such great inspiration from another (copyrighted) work that you would like to modify that work to create something new.  Are you allowed to do so?  Could you get a copyright to your new creation? As with most questions in law, the answer is: it depends.

“A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship” (17 U.S.C. § 101) is called a Derivative Work.  The original copyright owner typically has exclusive rights to “prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work” (17 U.S.C. § 106(2)).  It is considered copyright infringement to make or sell derivative works without permission from the original owner, which is where licenses typically come into play.

While creating a derivative work requires authorization, the right to register a copyright in a derivative work requires no such authority.  However, when copyrighting a derivative work, the copyright only extends to the material contributed to the original work and does not affect the scope of the original copyright.  Therefore, when registering the derivative work copyright, it is necessary to disclaim the portions previously copyrighted.

One issue that often arises is whether a derivative work is actually derivative, or rather new and different enough to be considered completely transformative.  When a work is deemed transformative, it is fair use to utilize a previously copyrighted work.  One famous case of arguably derivative works being considered transformative fair use is Cariou v. Prince.   Artist Richard Prince created works from Patrick Cariou’s black and white photographs, such as this one:

In 2013, the Second Circuit determined that “Prince’s artworks manifest an entirely different aesthetic from Cariou’s photographs.”  Specifically, the Court found Cariou’s black and white photographs to be “serene and deliberately composed portraits” while Prince “created collages on canvas that incorporate color” with the overall “composition, presentation, scale, color palette, and media” being “fundamentally different and new compared to the photographs.”

Richard Prince has also found himself in similar hot water for his 2015 exhibition “New Portraits” that consisted of photos taken from other Instagram users without permission.  Because Prince added his own commentary to these photographs, they were considered original artwork.

Overall, with artists such as Richard Price and cases such as Cariou v. Prince existing, the line between derivative and transformative can become blurred.  If you are creating a derivative work based upon another’s copyrighted work, Traverse Legal’s Attorneys can help you determine your rights and also file copyright to your derivative work.  Give us a call today!


Contact a traverse legal attorney:

Please select a Category of Law:

DefamationBusiness LawCorporate and SecuritiesEmployment LawCopyrightTrademarkPatentInternet LawReal EstatePersonal InjuryOther

If you decide to retain us, are you willing to pay a reasonable legal fee?


Due to current volume we are unable to offer free consultation. Therefore, we will not be contacting you. You should look for another attorney. You are also invited to review the free information on our website. Would you like to do a search?

Tell us as much detail about your issue as you can: