Protecting Legitimate Business Interests

June 7th, 2012

Well, a non-compete agreement, Matt, protects businesses. Most states in the country have indicated that in order for a non-compete agreement between an employer and an employee to be valid and enforceable, it must protect that business’s legitimate business interests.

Welcome to Trade Secret Law Radio, we bring you the best in trade secret news, legal advice and information.  From trade secret misappropriation to trade secret agreement drafting and negotiation, we cover the issues here.

Matt: Hi. It’s Matt Plessner for Trade Secret Law Radio. Today, we’re going to be talking about non-competes and protecting your legitimate business interests. To help us do that, we’re speaking with attorney-at-law, Mark Clark, from the Traverse Legal Office in Traverse City, Michigan. Mark, how are you?

Mark: I’m doing very well, Matt. How are you?

Matt: I’m doing very well. Thanks for asking. Mark, what does a non-compete protect?

Mark: Well, a non-compete agreement, Matt, protects businesses. Most states in the country have indicated that in order for a non-compete agreement between an employer and an employee to be valid and enforceable, it must protect that business’s legitimate business interests.

Matt: Mark, what is a legitimate business interest?

Mark: Well, Matt, the courts have varied on this, but again, most states have indicated that a non-compete agreement can’t simply be a restraint on trade and restrict competition. That means that a non-compete can’t exist simply to prevent an employee who leaves from competing with your business. What courts generally indicate is that a valid non-compete must protect what the law considers to be a legitimate business interest.

An employer may ask, “Well, if I really can’t restrict competition, what is a legitimate business interest?” Well, in fact, many courts have recognized that companies have a legitimate business interest in protecting their customer lists. A customer list, for instance, could be considered a trade secret and protectable under the laws of most states. Therefore, while a non-compete agreement may not exist simply to restrict competition, it may exist to protect a legitimate business interest in customer lists. There have been a lot of litigation and court cases, but the trend is to allow an employer to protect the legitimate business interests of protecting their customer lists.

One way this is done is to make sure that your restriction on the employee is reasonable in both scope and duration. In other words, a court may allow you to protect your customer lists by preventing a sales person from calling on your customers for a reasonable period of time. Some states will indicate that if you have extracted an unreasonable non-compete restriction in time or duration, that they will simply throw it out and make it non-valid.

So, when you are crafting a non-compete for a specific employee, consider what is reasonable, and you may want to consult with an attorney in terms of what your state has recognized as reasonable in both time and duration of the non-compete restrictions in order to make that non-compete valid.

Matt: Well, Mark, as always, thank you very much for hanging out with us today.

Mark: Thank you very much, Matt. It’s always a pleasure speaking with you.

Matt:
Join us next time on Trademark Law Radio. I’m Matt.

You’ve been listening to Trade Secret Law Radio, where trade secret protection, legal cases, and defenses are always the topic of the day.  Whether you are a trade secret attorney, a business looking to protect your trade secrets or have been accused of trade secret theft, we will answer your questions here.

Share Button

One Response to “Protecting Legitimate Business Interests”

  1. admin says:

    Some clients want to know whether or not business law can protect the very things about the company which provide competitive advantage over their competitors. The answer is, thankfully, yes. Trade secret law protects those aspects of your business which you protect from disclosure and provide you a competitive advantage. Trademark law protects your brand, slogan and other marks from use by anyone else who’s used my cause market confusion as to source and origin. Copyright law will protect any original works of authorship by you or your employees such as manuals, marketing materials, logo designs, websites and other items. Non-compete agreements will keep your most important employees from leaving your company and opening up shop across the street and stealing your customers. Business law incorporates all of these different ways to create value for your company by protecting it from others.

Leave a Reply

Domain attorney recommended by Domaining.com
© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan